The first few sips of a
new approach to teaching are always enticing to me; I love the sweet promise of
a new strategy that will satisfy my needs and tempt my students' taste
buds.
Strategies for building
on-level literacy skills are my new cuppa. My challenge now is getting
the mix just right as I attempt to recreate it in my own
"coffeemaker" classroom.
For the past few years, I have felt great about the strategies I
am using to help my high schoolers comprehend and analyze fiction. But
Probst and Beers' new book Reading Nonfiction is making me rethink my
semester two syllabus.
Isn't that always a
concern during winter break, when all the standards that we haven't yet
taught seem to leer at us from their place on the lengthy list as we decide
what MUST be covered before the next high stakes test?
Even though I am
comfortable abridging Romeo and Juliet to cover only its most
salient and intriguing scenes for my non-readers, I am still struggling with
the specifics of my new syllabus. Hearing echoes of "less is
more," I feel a pang of guilt in planning to use only a handful of short
stories this semester, supplemented with a few poems and a piece of bi-weekly
nonfiction to analyze carefully and for different purposes.
Why so few?
I have to find time for independent
reading for these students who are not independent readers and who would rather
do just about anything except read.
They must have on-level
reading skills to pass their graduation exam next year, so my work this
year is critical. So where am I going to find the time for all this
in-class and independent reading?
And grammar review?
And writing argument and
narrative?
Something's gotta give.
Times have certainly changed from when I began teaching almost two
decades ago. In those days, there were no academic standards; we chose
what we taught from the textbooks we were given or the beat-up sets of
trade books left in our classrooms from the previous teachers. Some
teachers paced themselves to just "get through the book." I
could never manage that. Either way, it didn't seem to matter so
much that our students were prepared to pass a particular test. Students
just needed to be able to think, to read, and to write an argument while
appreciating good literature. If they
could do that, they could pass a test.
Today, they still need
to be able to accomplish those goals.
But now, they ... and
I.. are visibly accountable for seeing that it happens.
That means I have to be
a better barista than I was before. I have to get the mix just right,
taking advantage of each ingredient and using it to highlight its best features
for the tastes of my customers. That means integrating
metacognition, specific reading skills that will help students grow, data
for tracking, and differentiation to meet the needs of my diverse
population.
Even so, sometimes today
with our high stakes pressures, literacy standards, and curriculum maps, we teachers still have to go with our gut as we mix our unique concoctions.
My gut says that the venti cup can be too much.
Less IS more, if the mix
is right.